When some of your people can’t be in the room, you have three options. Picking the right one is about who you’re serving and when they need it.
Live stream only
Best when being there as it happens is the point — a grandparent watching a wedding ceremony in real time, colleagues joining a memorial, parents overseas seeing a graduation. The value is shared presence in the moment. The trade-off: it’s a one-shot live production, and a raw stream recording is watchable but not polished.
Recording only
Best when timing doesn’t matter but quality does — a keepsake film of the ceremony, a training or worship recording for an archive, a highlight to share later. More room to get every shot right and to edit. The trade-off: nobody is ‘there’ with you.
Both — usually the right answer
The setup for a good live stream — multiple cameras, source audio, local recording on each camera — already produces the raw material for a polished edit. Adding ‘both’ is a smaller step up than buying each separately: remote guests get the live moment, and everyone gets a clean edited recording afterward.
How to decide
- Is there anyone for whom ‘live’ genuinely matters? → include the stream.
- Will you want to rewatch or share this in future? → include the recording.
- Both true (most events)? → book both; it’s the efficient combination.
- Neither — small room, everyone present, no archive need? → you may only want photography.
Frequently asked questions
Does ‘both’ cost twice as much?
Can the recording use the live stream footage?
Not sure which you need? Tell us about your event and your remote guests and we’ll recommend the setup that fits.
